首页> 外文OA文献 >The visiting friends or relatives traveler in the 21st century: time for a new definition
【2h】

The visiting friends or relatives traveler in the 21st century: time for a new definition

机译:21世纪来访的亲戚朋友:新定义的时机

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Travelers visiting friends or relatives (VFR travelers) are a group identified with an increased risk of travel-related illness. Changes in global mobility, travel patterns, and inter-regional travel led to reappraisal of the classic definition of the term VFR.\ud\udMETHODS: The peer-reviewed literature was accessed through electronic searchable sites (PubMed/Medline, ProMED, GeoSentinel, TropNetEurop, Eurosurveillance) using standard search strategies for the literature related to visiting friends/relatives, determinants of health, and travel. We reviewed the historic and current use of the definition of VFR traveler in the context of changes in population dynamics and mobility.\ud\udRESULTS: The term "VFR" is used in different ways in the literature making it difficult to assess and compare clinical and research findings. The classic definition of VFR is no longer adequate in light of an increasingly dynamic and mobile world population.\ud\udCONCLUSIONS: We propose broadening the definition of VFR travelers to include those whose primary purpose of travel is to visit friends or relatives and for whom there is a gradient of epidemiologic risk between home and destination, regardless of race, ethnicity, or administrative/legal status (eg, immigrant). The evolution and application of this proposed definition and an approach to risk assessment for VFR travelers are discussed.
机译:背景:探访朋友或亲戚的旅行者(VFR旅行者)是与旅行相关疾病风险增加的人群。全球流动性,出行方式和跨地区出行的变化导致对术语VFR的经典定义的重新评估。\ ud \ ud方法:同行评审文献通过电子可搜索的网站访问(PubMed / Medline,ProMED,GeoSentinel, (TropNetEurop,Eurosurveillance),使用标准搜索策略查找与探亲/亲戚,健康决定因素和旅行有关的文献。我们在人口动态和流动性变化的背景下回顾了VFR旅行者定义的历史和当前用法。\ ud \ ud结果:“ VFR”一词在文献中以不同的方式使用,因此难以评估和比较临床和研究结果。鉴于不断变化的世界人口和不断增加的流动性,VFR的经典定义已不再足够。\ ud \ ud结论:我们建议扩大VFR旅行者的定义,以包括那些主要旅行目的是探望朋友或亲戚以及针对谁的旅行者无论种族,种族或行政/法律地位(例如移民)如何,住所和目的地之间的流行病学风险之间存在梯度。讨论了该建议定义的演变和应用以及用于VFR旅行者的风险评估方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号